Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: "Charles Hottel" <chottel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:54:03 GMT
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mt52831elnu7vfkre8lu4c0jm0k591dm1f@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:55:30 GMT, "Charles Hottel"
<chottel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One place I worked used CALL 'ABEND'. Of course the ABEND module did not
exist.
That's funny.
We have a program that has a purpose of abending. It is called when
EasyTrieve programs return abending return codes. We also have an
old standard abending routine that creates a SOC9.
My opinion is if they want to disguise the abend, use the standard IBM
'CEE3ABC'. Or better yet, use return codes.
Back then I don'tthink there was a CEE3ABC.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Michael Mattias
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- References:
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Charles Hottel
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- Prev by Date: Creating a Web Service with COBOL...
- Next by Date: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Previous by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Next by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Index(es):