Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- From: "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:55:05 -0400
"William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lmpBi.24304$1J4.22640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I see - from your expansion (using the GR), the expanded text violates theSR.
Therefore, this circularity IS prohibited by the current rules (even if itisn't
totally "obvious" - to me - but possibly it is obvious to others).
I decided I wasn't being clear, so I worked on a
clarification that might prove better.
.
- References:
- SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- From: William M. Klein
- SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- Prev by Date: Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- Next by Date: Compiling forward references
- Previous by thread: Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- Next by thread: Re: SAME AS ('02 Standard) Clause - and circulatiy
- Index(es):
