comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Expressions of interest in a Remote COBOL server, please?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Web Service
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• OT: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: music and language skills
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Finding manuals of IBM Compiler directives
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Finding manuals of IBM Compiler directives
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Finding manuals of IBM Compiler directives
  • From: Ken Leidner
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Robert Jones
• OT: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Finding manuals of IBM Compiler directives
  • From: don_fitzgerald
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Larry Kahm
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Web Service
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Roger While
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• (OT) Private vs. Public education - was Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Ubuntu's Viability for Cross-Platform Development (Was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Web Service
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Larry Kahm
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Religian
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religion
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT[ - Keep off-topic, off-topic
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Religian
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Larry Kahm
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Religian
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT]Re: Religion
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religion (was:Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• [OT]Re: Religion
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• [OT[ - Keep off-topic, off-topic
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Religian
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Roger While
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Revised Index versus Subscript
  • From: Roger While
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Religian
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Roger While
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
  • From: Larry Kahm
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Web Service
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: small value problem
  • From: donald tees
• Re: small value problem
  • From:
• Re: small value problem
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: small value problem
  • From: HeyBub
• small value problem
  • From: Szymon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• [OT] Religian (was:Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• [OT] Local Corruption (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL Error Handling (was: What MF says about ROUNDED (was:Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Fileshare and Server Express
  • From: Robert
• Re: Fileshare and Server Express
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Fileshare and Server Express
  • From: umwelt
• Re: Final results of the survey of knowledge-sharing
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• RW - False Generalization (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Top / bottom possitng (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: dividby0
• Same Record Key and FD for multiple VSAM files (of same structure)
  • From: dividby0
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Voter registration in the US (wa Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Voter registration in the US (wa Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Voter registration in the US (wa Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Voter registration in the US (wa Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Top / bottom possitng
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• [OT] Top / bottom possitng (was: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MFonWindows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL Error Handling (was: What MF says about ROUNDED (was:Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• [OT] Viet Nam (was: Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: ISPF Edit/View HILITE to HTML macros
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL Error Handling (was: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: Robert
• Final results of the survey of knowledge-sharing
  • From: Dr . E . Murillo
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: New Fujitsu Cobol for Windows 9.0
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• COBOL Error Handling (was: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: ISPF Edit/View HILITE to HTML macros
  • From: prino
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: New Fujitsu Cobol for Windows 9.0
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• New Fujitsu Cobol for Windows 9.0
  • From: Mike Polinske
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Rounding timings
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Rounding timings
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• [OT] Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: Happy Birthday FORTRAN
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Roger While
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Alan Anderson
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• French COBOL (was: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Vincent Danion
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: LX-i
• [OT] Iraq (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• What MF says about ROUNDED (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: pgx
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• IMS (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Richard
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Logic vs. Conversation (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Richard
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Bruce_E_Banks
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: JAVA un z/OS
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Richard
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From:
• Re: JAVA un z/OS
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Looking for high rated photos
  • From: rock1
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Re: No reply, means NO REPLY (was: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: billious
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Finally to the point (was: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Robert
• Re: SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: No reply, means NO REPLY (was: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• SQL and Google (was: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• OT: Finally to the point (was: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• CMD file to compile Cobol
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: No reply, means NO REPLY (was: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard Brady
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From:
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Rick Smith
• No reply, means NO TEPLY (was: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From:
• Outil Gratuit pour le developpement de vos activites sur internet
  • From: buidoqu8
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: donald tees
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Reading Excel from within a COBOL program
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Reading Excel from within a COBOL program
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Reading Excel from within a COBOL program
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Reading Excel from within a COBOL program
  • From: razor
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: John Reagan
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: bfwd
• Reading Excel from within a COBOL program
  • From: razor
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: MicroFocus Missing Copy files.
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: About index variable in cobol
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: n8wxs@xxxxxxxx
• Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• [OT] Pedantry (Was: Cobol Myth Busters)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From:
• COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF on Windows)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: MicroFocus Missing Copy files.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: John Reagan
• MicroFocus Missing Copy files.
  • From: dcantua
• MicroFocus Missing Copy files.
  • From: dcantua
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: About index variable in cobol
  • From:
• Re: How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: donald tees
• Re: About index variable in cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: About index variable in cobol
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: About index variable in cobol
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• About index variable in cobol
  • From: dhushetty
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From:
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COPY vesus TYPEDEF
  • From: Rick Smith
• How to JUDGE what is "Good COBOL"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• The fate of Packed-Decimal (was: Error with COMP-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COPY vesus TYPEDEF
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• COPY vesus TYPEDEF
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Code Snippets in XML (Was: Error with COMP-3)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• [OT] Code Snippets in XML (Was: Error with COMP-3)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: LX-i
• Re: z/OS COBOL program to retrieve return codes and step names of a job
  • From: Helen
• Re: z/OS COBOL program to retrieve return codes and step names of a job
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• RW and "good COBOL" (was: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• z/OS COBOL program to retrieve return codes and step names of a job
  • From: Helen
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From:
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Richard
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: WHY TYPEDEFs (was: Discussions of COBOL philosophy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Robert
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: WHY TYPEDEFs (was: Discussions of COBOL philosophy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Error with COMP-3
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: VSAM file can't open???
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: LX-i
• Error with COMP-3
  • From: star6683
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From:
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: burke . john
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: VSAM file can't open???
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Alistair
• VSAM file can't open???
  • From: jr
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philosophy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• VisualAge COBOL & CICS
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Roger While
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: L Pruitt
• Re: No paragraphs in "standard" COBOL (was: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - Goetterdammerung (wase: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: No paragraphs in "standard" COBOL (was: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• OT - Goetterdammerung (wase: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: William M. Klein
• No paragraphs in "standard" COBOL (was: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• WHY TYPEDEFs (was: Discussions of COBOL philosophy
  • From: William M. Klein
• RW error (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• TYPEDEFs and Fujitsu (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• TYPEDEF - Micro Focus and Starndard (was: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philosophy
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Tim Josling
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From:
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Richard
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From:
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From:
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From:
• Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: LX-i
• Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From:
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: William M. Klein
• Can IT deal with change? was:
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Robert
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Cobol OnLine
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• EXIT SECTION/PARAGRAPH
  • From: Roger While
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Tim Josling
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: OT Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: L Pruitt
• Re: OT Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• OT Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Lucretia
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Cobol OnLine
  • From: AgustinZabala
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Michael Mattias
• IBM CICS - CBLPSHPOP and recursive programs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: burke . john
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Paul Raulerson
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Paul Raulerson
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Compare of signed fields
  • From: Doug Miller
• Compare of signed fields
  • From: burke . john
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• IBMCOMP (was Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: n8wxs@xxxxxxxx
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Aparajita
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: Was it Egypt? was Re: [OT]Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• OT: Was it Egypt? was Re: [OT]Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• [OT]Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• [OT] Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Robert
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Michael Mattias
• OT: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: "Free" workbench/IDE
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Roger While
• [OT] Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Roger While
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Robert
• Cobol Myth Busters
  • From: Robert
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From:
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without usingthecomparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Baby Update (final)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Baby Update (final)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using the comparison operators?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to find the greatest of two numbers without using thecomparison operators?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Basement tinkerers and inventors
  • From: Graham Hobbs