Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- From: Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:41:23 -0700
On 2 Sep, 02:32, docdw...@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
In article <1188684272.693113.252...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Alistair <alist...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have no wish to criticise your findings but I do have two points to
make:
Robert wrote:
[snip]
Finding: busted for simple cases, confirmed for cases with more than
one operation.
This proposition, I believe, derived from the early days when (perhaps
DD can cast his mind back that far and confirm it for us?) the COMPUTE
verb was shown to be less efficient than a multitude of other verbs
that accomplished the same task.
Mr Maclean, I recall being taught something like that lo, those many moons
ago... but I never tested it and I don't recall ever seeing a PMAP where a
COMPUTE was shown to be of lesser efficiency than simpler instructions.
My experiences are limited, of course, and my memory is, admittedly,
porous.
Just like Pete's toolbox?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- From:
- Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- References:
- Cobol Myth Busters
- From: Robert
- Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- From: Alistair
- Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- From:
- Cobol Myth Busters
- Prev by Date: Re: Bloody PARADIGM shifts again!!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- Previous by thread: Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- Next by thread: Re: Cobol Myth Busters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading