Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:05:45 -0500
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:30:37 +1200, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Personally, I find it very exciting and am beginning to use C# to run Query
Expressions rather than SQL. It is very early days yet and I am still
learning, but it is much more natural than SQL., and integrates seamlessly
into the language.
The AT&T Daytona database translates SQL queries (actually a superset of SQL) into
well-written C, compiles it and then executes it on Many Parallel Processors. Speed is
eight times faster than the best of PL/SQL, PERL, Python, etc. It routinely queries
databases with more than a trillion rows.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- References:
- COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Charles Hottel
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Robert
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- From: Pete Dashwood
- COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- Prev by Date: Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
- Previous by thread: Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- Next by thread: Re: COBOL and DB2 vs. Java and DB2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|