Re: Rounding timings
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:45:20 -0500
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:40:03 GMT, "William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and in all cases confirm that using the ROUNDED phrase is faster (no matter how
much) than doing the arithmetic yourself.
Now, can you admit it, that was what the original recommendation said?
How much impact this could have on an application would depend upon how much
rounding (and in what constructs) there were, but the original recommendation
("myth") certainly seems confirmed.
Correct. I didn't say the test results busted a myth. I don't recall the conversation that
prompted my running this test. People keep starting new threads for no good reason,
thereby making it difficult to trace a thread backward.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rounding timings
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Rounding timings
- References:
- Rounding timings
- From: Robert
- Re: Rounding timings
- From: William M. Klein
- Rounding timings
- Prev by Date: Final results of the survey of knowledge-sharing
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL "non-myth" confirmed - Index and subscripts (MF onWindows)
- Previous by thread: Re: Rounding timings
- Next by thread: Re: Rounding timings
- Index(es):