Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- From: "Roger While" <simrw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:24:14 +0200
"Robert" <no@xxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:2q1mf3t9mjvlfrpnijijm1vgea6tb5ss0t@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:14:19 +0200, "Roger While" <simrw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Note that on big-endian boxen, COMP == COMP-5 which
I did not make clear in my post.
What it all comes down to is: can you define
a subscript equivalent to an index with the attributes that apply to this
specific implemenation on this specific hardware?
And regards asm instructions -
Mostly compiler producers release according to
a platform and a OS release.
MF releases on a LCD (least common demoninator) from
supported platforms.
This means that MF does not (and can not) use eg SSE stuff
unless it is specifically targeted/required.
BSWAP is not an SSE instruction. It has been available on every Intel
since '486.
I never said the above.
Both OC and MF use bswap.
.
- References:
- Revised Index versus Subscript
- From: Roger While
- Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- From: Roger While
- Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- From: Robert
- Revised Index versus Subscript
- Prev by Date: Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Previous by thread: Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- Next by thread: Re: Revised Index versus Subscript
- Index(es):