Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration

On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:54:42 GMT, "Larry Kahm"
<lkahm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I've always been a proponent of keeping the control of the compile process
in the change management system. In your case, since it was a known issue,
I'd have you simply enter the appropriate override on the ChangeMan or
Endevor panel. It remains associated with your program from then on.

I agree. I created a program that I could call to return IDMS
db-keys which are stored in numbers bigger than standard CoBOL could
read. In my tests, I could stick the compile parm on top of the
code, but Endevor's compile ignored those. We had to create a new
Compile type for this program.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IBMs CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
    ... I've always been a proponent of keeping the control of the compile process ... in the change management system. ... the choice in the change management product when they compile the program. ... compile options are standardized in the change management product. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: "pointers" in /clr
    ... > explicitly declared "override" if they override an existing one. ... > it once and compile standard native C++ code into pure managed ... Automatically substituting static ... > much forced to rewrite it, or to wrap unmanaged code into managed classes. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Re: abstract static methods (again)
    ... would have the restriction that the type T is known at compile time. ... the attempt to call the no-args constructor of the class. ... If you forgot to override pseudoStatic(), then the derived class will not ... No old code would be broken if these extensions ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: What is QRArch used for?
    ... So what's the difference between ARM5T and ARM4T? ... that I need to override the ARM4T with ARM5T? ... "Luca Calligaris" wrote: ... with 'compile for ARM 5T architecture'. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsce.embedded)
  • Re: Multiple level base calls
    ... that declaring PrintMe() in classes A, B, ... compile this code, you would have found that it wouldn't, because you ... override, so you won't get the polymorphic behaviour that the OP wants. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)