Re: Iraq
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:27:01 -0500
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:52:23 -0700, Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 27 Sep, 20:41, Howard Brazee <how...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:07:31 -0700, Alistair
<alist...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The numbers many not be 100% accurate, but they are close and they do
tell a picture.
Probably not even 20% accurate.
So let's start off with the figure that the president (who wants the
number to look small), agrees with. Is 160,000 lives a reasonable
cost? How many is too many?
If it were your wife who died as a result of terrorist action then you
would probably argue that 160,000 was nowhere near enough.
As the bible puts it: 53 eyes for an eye; 53 teeth for a tooth.
That doesn't sound right. Shouldn't the number of teeth be divisiible by 32?
.
- References:
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: LX-i
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: SkippyPB
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: LX-i
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: LX-i
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: donald tees
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: SkippyPB
- Re: Iraq
- From: Alistair
- Re: Iraq
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Iraq
- From: Alistair
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Next by Date: Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- Previous by thread: Re: Iraq
- Next by thread: Re: Iraq
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
