Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
In article <oo8rf35kntemgvluc6jrcvjeuu34n4gg4m@xxxxxxx>,
Robert <no@xxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Waterfall methodologies don't deal
with it because they hate to admit there are errors in production code.
I've seen human beings admit to, deny, hate and love things (or at least
say that they do)... but never a methodology. Our experiences must be
different; I have never worked on a system where someone, somewhere does
not claim that code in Prod is error-free; the best is usually 'It's been
running smoothly since we corrected for the last unexpected set of
conditions.'
DD
.
- References:
- IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- From: Larry Kahm
- Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- From: Larry Kahm
- Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- From: Arnold Trembley
- Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- From: Robert
- IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Previous by thread: Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- Next by thread: Re: IBM's CCCA and customized LCPs for Enterprise COBOL migration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|