Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: "William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:48:06 GMT
My memory (without verifying this) is that they canNOT read each other's
proprietary systems. However, I think (but again am not positive) that all of
them have an option for using C-ISAM *instead* of their own "native" systems. I
don't know if this helps, but it might.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5m8mc4Fcb1ukU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Can anyone tell me if MicroFocus COBOL can read Fujitsu ISAM files, and vice
versa? What about Realia?
Obviously, at the source code level (SELECT and FD/01) the code is compatible,
but what about object level?
Is there a single PC ISAM system, or do all the COBOL vendors have their own
proprietary indexed system which is delivered with their COBOL compiler?
I know what I THINK the answer is, but would be gald to hear any other
facts/opinions about this.
Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Richard
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- References:
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Previous by thread: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Index(es):