Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:45:05 -0500
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:18:10 +1300, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Can anyone tell me if MicroFocus COBOL can read Fujitsu ISAM files, and vice
versa? What about Realia?
Obviously, at the source code level (SELECT and FD/01) the code is
compatible, but what about object level?
Is there a single PC ISAM system, or do all the COBOL vendors have their own
proprietary indexed system which is delivered with their COBOL compiler?
I know what I THINK the answer is, but would be gald to hear any other
facts/opinions about this.
Let's assume you have a Fujitsu program that wants to access Micro Focus files.
1. Write a file access program, compile under MF to a .dll, call it from Fujitsu.
2. The MF extfh functions are well defined. Call them directly from Fujitsu.
3. Use ODBC.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- References:
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Prev by Date: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Previous by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Index(es):