Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Richard <riplin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:58:47 -0700
On Sep 30, 5:48 pm, "William M. Klein" <wmkl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
My memory (without verifying this) is that they canNOT read each other's
proprietary systems. However, I think (but again am not positive) that all of
them have an option for using C-ISAM *instead* of their own "native" systems. I
don't know if this helps, but it might.
You may be thinking of Btrieve.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- References:
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: William M. Klein
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Prev by Date: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by Date: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Previous by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Index(es):