Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: "Judson McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:05:52 -0500
"Richard" <riplin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"William M. Klein" <wmkl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My memory (without verifying this) is that they canNOT read each other's
proprietary systems. However, I think (but again am not positive) that all of
them have an option for using C-ISAM *instead* of their own "native" systems. I
don't know if this helps, but it might.
You may be thinking of Btrieve.
MF COBOL & Net Express can most definitely use Btrieve. Been doing
that for nearly 20 years.
--
Judson McClendon judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
.
- References:
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- From: Richard
- How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Prev by Date: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Previous by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by thread: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Index(es):