comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: HeyBub
• Help with Inspect _src_ replacing all [SPACE]ALPHANUMERIC[SPACE] by space
  • From: vferr094
• MF COBOL Personal Edition: Differences with/without Visual Studio?
  • From: Lüko Willms
• Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Important and Urgent
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Important and Urgent
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Alistair
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Important and Urgent
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: HansJ
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From:
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Important and Urgent
  • From: purvi
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Robert
• Re: The MOVE problem
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Howard Brazee
• The MOVE problem
  • From: Roger While
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Robert
• Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
  • From: Rene_Surop
• A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
  • From: editormt
• Re: System Conversion - An Overview
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From:
• [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
  • From:
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: billious
• [OT] Drug Dealers vs. Geeks
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: LX-i
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From:
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From:
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From:
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Data validation (NUMERIC checking follow-on)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Alistair
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From:
• [OT?] z/OS 1.9 Features summary
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Data validation (NUMERIC checking follow-on)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Data validation (NUMERIC checking follow-on)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: Sergey Kashyrin
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Sergey Kashyrin
• Re: "Free" workbench/IDE
  • From: Lüko Willms
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: XML generate
  • From: Pakku
• COBOL to Java conversion
  • From: HansJ
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: Robert
• Re: XML generate
  • From: cschneid_google
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: XML generate
  • From: CG
• TRUNC(BIN) and COMP-5
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: XML generate
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• XML generate
  • From: Pakku
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Vivian
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: billious
• PLUG: txt2pdf 9.5
  • From: mail
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Table SORT and normal SORT
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Table SORT and normal SORT
  • From: Roger While
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cornstarch?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: LX-i
• Cornstarch?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• (WWW.CNCIRCLE.COM)cheap wholesale hoodies, jeans, discount. wholesale nike shoes, adidas,puma, lacoste,parada.lv.gucci store outlet
  • From: huangcba1
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From:
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Robert
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Data validation (NUMERIC checking follow-on)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Robert
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Deleting a marked item from an unsorted database with a single query
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From:
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Deleting a marked item from an unsorted database with a single query
  • From: JB
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Robert
• Re: So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: William M. Klein
• So, what about PERFORM...VARYING ?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Urgent!!! Tandem Cobol Professionals for UAE
  • From:
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Maximum Kb Passed In WSDL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Data validation (NUMERIC checking follow-on)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Richard
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Richard
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Urgent!!! Tandem Cobol Professionals for UAE
  • From: vam
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Andreas Lerch
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Richard
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Larry Kahm
• Re: - Need help searching the web
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From:
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From:
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Robert
• copylib cross-reference?
  • From: Maxine
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL myth busted, index versus subscript (MF on HP)
  • From: Vivian
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From:
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Richard
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Robert
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: hhinman
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Robert
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: news
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: news
• Re: [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Robert
• [OT] - Need help searching the web
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Stategy for (Large?) 16bit COBOL code conversion to Net Express
  • From: news
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Value of being smart was Re: Iraq
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Tim Josling
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Computer software(programs, applications...)
  • From: draganw
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: DFSORT (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Static versus dynamic SQL was Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Installing MF COBOL 3.2 (16-bit) on Win 2000 Pro
  • From: Robert
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Robert
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Installing MF COBOL 3.2 (16-bit) on Win 2000 Pro
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Installing MF COBOL 3.2 (16-bit) on Win 2000 Pro
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Robert
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: netcobol question
  • From: Doug Miller
• netcobol question
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: DFSORT (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: tleaders...gmail.com
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Static versus dynamic SQL was Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Robert
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOLphilospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: DFSORT (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: DFSORT (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Static versus dynamic SQL was Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: checking if NUMERIC
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: Robert
• checking if NUMERIC
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [Semi-OT] IBM's IMS V10 Announcement
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: LX-i
• OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [SeimOT] IBM, Linux, and IFLs
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: [Semi-OT] IBM's IMS V10 Announcement
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [Semi-OT] IBM's IMS V10 Announcement
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• CICS TS V2.3 - End-of-Marketing and End-of-Service dates
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• [Semi-OT] IBM's IMS V10 Announcement
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: Karl Kiesel
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Examine vs Inspect
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Examine vs Inspect
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: "Substantive Changes"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• How important is software maintenance?
  • From: editormt
• Use of open source was Re: OO past and future was Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: MF DB2 Compilations
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO past and future was Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• "Substantive Changes" (was: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• OO past and future was Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Linux on IBM mainframes was Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Has lack of testing of object change affected reliabliity?Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: [SeimOT] IBM, Linux, and IFLs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• EXHIBIT (was: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Robert
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: HeyBub
• [SeimOT] IBM, Linux, and IFLs
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• CCC - CODASYL COBOL COMMITTEE and ANSI (was: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: William M. Klein
• OO and IBM z series COBOL was Re: Discussions of COBOL philospphy
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Why so many of us disegard RW's content (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• DFSORT (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Why so many of us disegard RW's content (was: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: [OT[ Louder cars
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: [OT[ Louder cars (was: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL and uni-SPF - migration to HP-UX
  • From: jcfdez
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Why would COBOL act like this?
  • From: Tom
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OO and COBOL (was: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [OT[ Louder cars (was: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• MF DB2 Compilations
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From:
• Re: (OT) Hell
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: Hell
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Unix scripting
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: OO and COBOL (was: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OO and COBOL (was: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• OO COBOL - What if ???
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• OO and COBOL (was: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• OO and COBOL (was: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: donald tees
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: donald tees
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: donald tees
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: donald tees
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: Unix scripting
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: Iraq
  • From: Alistair
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Alistair
• OT: Unix scripting
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Need some Cobol help
  • From: Howard
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Robert
• Re: rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: donald tees
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: rounding
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: rounding
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From:
• Re: What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• What matters most when getting a job done?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Need some Cobol help
  • From: billious
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: rounding
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Need some Cobol help
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Need some Cobol help
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need some Cobol help
  • From: HeyBub
• Need some Cobol help
  • From: Howard
• Re: rounding
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: [OT] Flat Tax (was Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Taxes
  • From:
• Re: Taxes
  • From:
• [OT] Flat Tax (was Re: [OT] Iraq)
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From:
• Re: rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: rounding
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: bfwd
• Re: rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Taxes
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: Taxes
  • From:
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Taxes
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: rounding
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: rounding
  • From: Louis Krupp
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Hiroshima Facts
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: rounding
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Taxes
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: rounding
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Expressions of interest in a Remote COBOL server, please?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• rounding
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Expressions of interest in a Remote COBOL server, please?
  • From: PR
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Taxes
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OT: Taxes
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: Taxes
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Iraq
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: NZ street crime - bras and knickers
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Expressions of interest in a Remote COBOL server, please?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: NZ street crime - bras and knickers
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: NZ street crime - bras and knickers
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From:
• Testing with older IE versions
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Iraq
  • From: LX-i
• OT: NZ street crime - bras and knickers
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Expressions of interest in a Remote COBOL server, please?
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Richard
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert
• Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
  • From: Robert

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(12)