Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: "HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:59:47 -0500
Howard Brazee wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:48:12 -0600, LX-i <lxi0007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Inherent human rights exist without taking away the rights of
others.
They do? Name them.
I did - why did you snip them?
I just re-read the previous messages in the thread, and could not find
any rights listed that exist without conflicting with rights of
others. I am not convinced that such exist.
Any "right" claimed by one imposes a corresponding "duty" on someone else.
You can't have one without the other.
Conflict arises, of course, when that imposed duty conflicts with an
inherent right.
.
- References:
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: LX-i
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: LX-i
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: [OT] Iraq
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Next by Date: Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Iraq
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|