EXHIBIT (was: OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: "William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:41:42 GMT
"Robert" <no@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6pahg3thm2uthlosrh69joht20033r1b9e@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:22:06 -0600, LX-i <lxi0007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<snip>
I never
understood how EXHIBIT was supposed to be better than DISPLAY - I guess
I was just late to the game. Yes, I removed them when I converted
programs from COBOL 74 to COBOL 85, but it was trivial, IMO.
The advantage was in the NAMED option. EXHIBIT NAMED A B C displayed
A = xxx
B = yyy
C = zzz
Micro Focus still has EXHIBIT .. and also TRACE.
I really liked using EXHIBIT with both NAMED and CHANGED. It was a great help
before interactive debuggers with "monitors" and "breakpoint upon value change"
features.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
.
- References:
- OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: LX-i
- Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: Robert
- Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: LX-i
- Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- From: Robert
- OO COBOL - What if ???
- Prev by Date: Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by Date: Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Previous by thread: Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- Next by thread: Re: OO COBOL - What if ???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|