Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:24:32 +1300
"Robert" <no@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q34ig3tj7uun0ug6iclnhdht63rii3adbc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:37:02 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"<snip>
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Robert" <no@xxxxxx> wrote in message
I take your point.Someone should fix the root cause of 'incidents' so they don't happenThat is what tech teams endeavour to do.
again.
Right. That's what they're supposed to do. Too often they act as
gatekeepers rather than
enablers.
Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
.
- References:
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Alistair
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Robert
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: tlmfru
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From:
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Robert
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Robert
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- From: Robert
- Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Prev by Date: Re: OO past and future was Re: How proprietary is the "COBOL file system"
- Next by Date: Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Previous by thread: Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Next by thread: Re: Do you have a Knowledge Officer?
- Index(es):