Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- From: "HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:57:19 -0500
Charles Hottel wrote:
I have learned that we now have around 860 contractors working on
our "new" system. I put new in quotes because the current system was
used for the specifications for the new system. That 860 number is
after they got rid of a lot of SAP people. They tried to replace one
subsystem with 80% vanilla SAP and 20% ABAP, but the vanilla SAP
could not do even 60%. All of this just to say they no longer have
COBOL and now have the new and improved and 20% to 30% slower state
of the art Java. In one lunch room they have a huge chart of system
development processes and paperwork deliverables. If you live in the
USA then sorry, it it your tax dollars at work :-(
This echos what I've learned from long experience.
A large system designed from scratch will not work and cannot be made to
work. You have to start over with a working, smaller system. However, a
large system, produced by expanding the dimensions of a smaller system, does
not behave like the smaller system.
In a large system, malfunction, or even total non-function, may not be
detectable for long periods, if ever. The total behavior of large systems
cannot be predicted.
Some complex systems actually work. If a system is working, leave it alone.
In setting up a new system, tread softly. You may be disturbing another
system that is actually working.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- References:
- [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- From:
- Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- From: Charles Hottel
- [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: The MOVE problem
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL to Java conversion
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] System Conversion - An Overview
- Index(es):