Re: The MOVE problem


<docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:fgb03p$kmc$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <56_Vi.15993$lD6.14460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Doug Miller <spambait@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <ssZVi.44717$b9.24845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Judson
McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Bill, I thought you would come back with a definitive response.
:-)

MOVE A(B) TO B C(B).

I would never consider writing such code as in this example. Code should
be written to be as simple and easy to understand as possible, and this
example violates that principle. Using two statements would make the
intent
obvious.

DING DING DING! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen! *That* is the
correct
answer.

Never mind that the Original Poster's question was 'What shouzld (sic) be

Per dictionary -
so; thus: usually written parenthetically to denote that a word, phrase,
passage, etc., that may appear strange or incorrect has been written
intentionally or has been quoted verbatim: He signed his name as e. e.
cummings (sic).

Not intentinial and not quoted.

Roger


displayed in various compatible modes?', of course. I'm sure that would
go over quite well in a tech interview:

'Here's one of our Production programs... what should be displayed in
various compatible modes?'

'I would never consider writing such code.'

'Thanks much... next, please.'

DD



.