Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:21:37 +0000 (UTC)
In article <9sv1k3pg0amhvqoi4okq65527chl2n9og1@xxxxxxx>,
Robert <no@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:32:46 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
Back in the Oldene Dayse sites I worked on had test environments
which mirrored prod, so that the JCL used in both was identical except for
the change of a symbolic... down to the JOBLIB cards.
We do the same.
For lo, there is nothing entirely new under the sun... no, wait, that's
been said before.
Things ran fairly
well, biweeklies, monthlies, quarterlies and annual jobs; there'd be an
806 every once in a while but I don't recall it happening too often.
I suspect that shop's applications used fewer third party libraries and
calls to programs
belonging to other applications.
I have no idea what you are using as a baseline for 'many' or 'fewer', Mr
Wagner, but there were some places where everything was home-grown and
others with bunches of out-of-shop code being executed.
Perhaps a non-traditionalist might be able to come up with something
similar for other systems... and keep in mind that it has been said 'You
can make something foolproof... but not damned-fool proof.
"He who despairs of the human condition is a coward, but he who has hope
for it is a
fool."
Albert Camus
'Invent a better mousetrap and the world will present you with a better
mouse'. - Anonymous.
DD
.
- References:
- Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- From: Robert
- Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- From: Robert
- Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- From:
- Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- From: Robert
- Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- Prev by Date: Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- Previous by thread: Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- Next by thread: Re: COBOL's Influence on C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|