Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:23:04 -0700
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:27:26 -0600, "HeyBub" <heybub@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is not in serious doubt amongst scientists at all. It is an
accepted fact by the majority of scientists and only seriously doubted
by those such as yourself who doubt science and distrust scientists
(because the scientists hidden agenda is not your hidden agenda).
Majority vote in determining truth is the venue of the liberal arts
(English, History, Cello), not science. It is totally irrelevant how many
scientist support or deny a claim.
In a forum such as this, it does indicate that advocates of the less
accepted positions have their work cut out.
The world and the Internet have advocates for a tremendous amount of
wild ideas. It is reasonable to demand more support for the less
mainstream ideas before accepting that they might be correct. Of
course, once they have such evidence, scientists accept them and they
become mainstream.
.
- References:
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: tlmfru
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Alistair
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: HeyBub
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Prev by Date: Re: working storage values
- Next by Date: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|