Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:31:09 -0700
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:07:57 -0600, "Judson McClendon"
<judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How did you discover that this is a fact?
I majored in Physics, but any physics student knows this.
I majored in Physics as well. Causality is a useful assumption to
make - but that's what it is, an assumption. It doesn't reach the
stage of being a hypothesis.
How can I test this hypothesis of yours?
No hypothesis, logically provable from known natural laws.
Ahh, then someone must have done this proof - do you have a link?
Although if it is the nature of Rene Descartes's "proof", don't
bother.
I don't see your argument is any more logical than the argument you
claim people who believe in the Big Bang use. You assume that
everything in this universe has to be created (just because),
therefore there must be something that is outside of this universe
that doesn't have to be created.
Your failure to see is just your failure to see. Doesn't invalidate the logic.
The logic was already invalid.
.
- References:
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: tlmfru
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: donald tees
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Next by Date: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Thanksgiving
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|