Re: Vista
- From: Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:31:47 -0800 (PST)
On 25 Dec, 23:46, LX-i <lxi0...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Mattias wrote:
I don't know - I remember, in the NT line, that 4 was quicker (and had
that spiffy new UI) than 3.51, and Windows 2000 was even better than 4.
I know that Pete's praised XP as a near-perfect OS, and I'll have to
say that I somewhat agree.
XP is so perfect that MS has released XP SP3 RC 1. Incidentally, since
installing the XP December updates from MS I noticed that the machine
has slowed significantly. A friend has reported the same slowing on
his XP box. I have switched searchindexer off and it still runs slow.
Any ideas?
.
- References:
- OT: Vista
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: Vista
- From: HeyBub
- OT: Re: Vista
- From: Paul Knudsen
- Re: Re: Vista
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: Vista
- From: tim Josling
- Re: Vista
- From: Michael Mattias
- Re: Vista
- From: LX-i
- OT: Vista
- Prev by Date: Re: working storage values
- Next by Date: Re: working storage values
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista
- Next by thread: Re: Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|