Re: help with tables

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:26:34 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:

In article <gfl2q319rd84spnb10q3f9huuvjq2254f9@xxxxxxx>,
Robert <no@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:37:24 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:

In article <bav1q3t26jjt26156j9eh4lpp1ivtot9a0@xxxxxxx>,
Robert <no@xxxxxx> wrote:

That's similar to a way I have seen things done on mainframes, yes... but
a way that would not pass muster in more than a few shops where I've
worked and would have gotten you laughed out of Prod Implementation
reviews.

I've never seen a Prod Implementation review. I've only seen reviews
BEFORE testing began.
Sounds like you're putting untested rewrites into production.

That might be due to the fact that it is something you admit to being
outside of your experience, Mr Wagner; a Prod Implementation review can
require a programmer to submit test results.

In my experience, test results are checked by TEST TEAMS, who run pair,
integration,
system, regression and performance tests. Each test case is evidenced by
a document
showing expected versus actual, and signed in blood.

Now think of expanding your experience, Mr Wagner... and imagine that the
TEST TEAM (caps original) makes a copy of their documentation... and
returns it (in exchange for a signature, of course), to the programmer...

Tests plans and results, along with all other project documentation, reside in a framework
repository that's accessible to everyone. There is no reason to print them out.

who brings this stack o' foolscap along when he sits down with other folks
at a Prod Implementation meeting.

Our meetings are held in cyberspace using NetMeeting or similar. Participants are all over
the world; they are not sitting in a room.

Moreover, the development team is often disbanded before the project goes to production.
There is no reason for a programmer to be the project's advocate; that's the job of
project managers.

There... that wasn't so difficult, was it? A wonderful world it is, that
has New Things - even from decades past! - to learn in it.

Sounds to me like Old Things.

Are your code reviews done with hardcopy marked up with highlighters, 1970s style?
Ours are done with file comparison programs such as Beyond Compare.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: help with tables
    ... I've never seen a Prod Implementation review. ... Now think of expanding your experience, Mr Wagner... ... returns it, to the programmer... ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: help with tables
    ... Robert wrote: ... I've never seen a Prod Implementation review. ... Now think of expanding your experience, Mr Wagner... ... Not everyone's meetings were what your meetings are, ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: help with tables
    ... Robert wrote: ... I've never seen a Prod Implementation review. ... Now think of expanding your experience, Mr Wagner... ... TEST TEAM makes a copy of their documentation... ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: help with tables
    ... I've never seen a Prod Implementation review. ... My keypunch machine was down. ... its macro language was anything that compiled to machine language. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)