Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:19:48 +0000 (UTC)
In article <62mictF24egjcU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pete Dashwood <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
What was of particular interest to me (and not referenced in Bill's post) is
the recent salary and overtime shake up at IBM.
http://www.pressconnects.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080124/BUSINESS/801240335
There are some VERY disgruntled employees who are being told to take a 15%
drop in salary at a time when the company is still making a profit. How many
will vote with their feet, and what effect this will have (if any) remains
to be seen.
Hmmmm... aaaaallllll the way at the bottom I found:
--begin quoted text:
The federal court case, Rosenburg, et. al, vs. IBM, was brought against
IBM by employees who said they should be paid overtime; IBM argued to the
contrary. But in November, 2006, IBM and the plaintiffs settled before
trial and IBM earmarked $65 million in back pay.
--end quoted text
.... so it seems that IBM was using the old 'you work an hour, we pay you
an hour... EXCEPT after a certain point because you're salaried and not
hourly-paid employees.'
DD
.
- References:
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Clark F Morris
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Prev by Date: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by Date: Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
- Previous by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|