Re: Poplulation control was Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back

In article <0zyxj.82260$vt2.22767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Judson McClendon <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
William M. Klein <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"terminology" is always a clue to emotional intent.

Pro-Life vs Anti-Abortion
Pro-Choice vs Pro-Abortion

Hmmmmmm... I wonder what kind of intent might be garnered from a proposing
of terms like 'pre-natal', 'para-natal' and 'post-natal'?

Some utterly fiendish agenda, assuredly... not even worth responding to,
some might say... or not-say.

Or one might chose to look beyond the surface and see that the issue
is to what purpose the is taxonomy applied.

Mr McClendon, you asked a question about logic. Given that terms should
be defined before manipulating them logically a division into categories
(taxonomy) was proposed as a basis for dealing with logic.

You were asked, thrice, how that proposal failed.

You refused, thrice, to demonstrate how the taxonomy was flawed and seem
to base your responses on an a priori rejection, not a logical one.

Thrice asked, thrice refused, no more needs be said.

DD

.