Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:10:55 -0700
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:36:14 -0600, "Judson McClendon"
<judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're right. And when these new "programmers" face a situation that
requires actual programming skills, they're lost. I think a demarcation
between the two different skills would be useful. Perhaps something
like "application assembler" rather than "programmer" would be a
better description for such people. It always gets me when people
who can only write HTML (for example) claim to be "programmers."
It's like a typist claiming to be an "author."
That's what people said about the newcomers who only used compilers to
do what they wanted, instead of actually programming.
.
- References:
- OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Michael Mattias
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Judson McClendon
- OT: The Geek defense
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Index(es):