Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: billg999@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Gunshannon)
- Date: 28 Feb 2008 15:30:17 GMT
In article <mhjds31tvl7jbd2qak9i6jomifqi5sk2q3@xxxxxxx>,
Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:19:18 GMT, "Michael Mattias"
<mmattias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, many of the modern development tools/environments allow
"developers" to create applications without ever learning those
fundamentals. A few clicks, a few drags, a few drops and presto! you can
call yourself a programmer.
With no such tools available, people of our generation HAD to learn the
fundamentals, so for us changing languages or development environments is
pretty straightforward... except when we find ourselves in one of these
newfangled IDEs where fundamentals don't matter.
Of course, each generation redefines "fundamentals" in industries that
change. Back in the day, people said that if you only knew assembly
language, you missed the fundamentals of machine language. Then
compilers came along.
Which didn't change the truth of the first statement.
Fundamentals such as using manual transmissions "don't matter" to most
drivers today.
I wouldn't consider that fundamental to driving a car. Knowing the
functions of the pedals is. One does not need to know how a computer
works to generate an executable from a source file. One does in order
to be a programmer.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
billg999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
.
- References:
- OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Michael Mattias
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Howard Brazee
- OT: The Geek defense
- Prev by Date: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|