Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:29:41 -0800 (PST)
On 28 Feb, 01:51, "Pete Dashwood" <dashw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In fact, the main argument for doing the Java conversion is so that new age
programmers can maintain code (and they need to do this less in an OO
language, than a non-OO one, if they play their cards right...) in a
language they are familiar with. If this language is also perceived as being
"past its sell-by date", then there may be no point in converting to it.
Instead, re-write or re-script what needs change and do it in whatever
language facilitates that, whether it is C#, PHP, or Ruby...
Ruby is generating fierce interest in Europe, even more than elsewhere.
So too is GROOVY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: tim
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- References:
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Clark F Morris
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|