Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:40:47 -0600
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:21:17 +1300, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:60kds353b7f9nkqjphund2g8q3t34b3g2i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:51:24 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I still think that the paradigm is important and that means Java will have
a
place, for a lot longer than COBOL.
Than CoBOL will, or than CoBOL has?
I can't see ANY other language (with the possible exception of FORTRAN;
successful because it is ideally adapted to the niche it serves...) having
as long a life as COBOL has and will.
If widespread in-house COBOL development ceases by 2015 (as I have
consistently predicted since 1997), COBOL will have had a "useful lifetime"
of 56 years.
C was invented in 1972. I'll bet systems software will still be written in C in 2028.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- References:
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Clark F Morris
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Prev by Date: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|