Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:46:29 -0700
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:07:12 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I disagreed then and I disagree now, Doc. :-)
BUT, I disagree less vehemently now... :-) I see your point and given that
that is your position, then you are right that daily billing probably won't
work for you.
For me it works. I don't mind them "stealing" some of my time; in fact, I'm
happy to "donate" it, as long as it works both ways. If the minimum daily
time was 8 hours, then it wouldn't be working both ways and I would move
much closer to your position.
But that's not disagreeing with DD's previous post. Note what he
said:
PHM: 'We expect a Professional Day out of you... if you have to put in a
little extra time to get the job done then you do it.'
Me: 'That sounds reasonable... and if I get the job done in less time the
I get to go home early?'
.
- References:
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Robert
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From:
- Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by Date: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Previous by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Next by thread: Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|