Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim <TimJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:56:59 -0000
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:07:22 -0600, Robert wrote:
The general explanation is good programmers solve logic problems
non-verbally. When I think about an abstract programming issue, lets say
a parser, I see an IMAGE of words broken apart. When I explain it to
someone, I use my hands a lot, as though gesturing at a whiteboard. I'm
pointing at the images I see and expressing the parsing process in words
for the first time. That explains the correlation between programming
and music; both are non-verbal forms of expressing abstractions.
Excellent. This explains how the two pieces of research can be reconciled.
Programmers are constructing a visual model in their heads and using that
to think about the computer and the program.
I remember spending a day with a highly paid lawyer working on a legal
dispute. I was there to advise him on the technical side of things. It was
difficult to communicate with him because he thought in a completely
verbal way. He turned everything into a little paragraph that he
memorized.
A couple of times I suggested I could clarify things by drawing him a
picture. Bad idea! I may as well have suggested explaining it in Swahili.
Tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- References:
- OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Robert
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Robert
- OT: The Geek defense
- Prev by Date: socket interface
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|