Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: "Judson McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:39:13 -0600
"tim" <TimJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robert wrote:
The general explanation is good programmers solve logic problems
non-verbally. When I think about an abstract programming issue, lets say
a parser, I see an IMAGE of words broken apart. When I explain it to
someone, I use my hands a lot, as though gesturing at a whiteboard. I'm
pointing at the images I see and expressing the parsing process in words
for the first time. That explains the correlation between programming
and music; both are non-verbal forms of expressing abstractions.
Excellent. This explains how the two pieces of research can be reconciled.
Programmers are constructing a visual model in their heads and using that
to think about the computer and the program.
We've discussed this issue here before. For a long time I thought that
all programmers were visual. But I once mentioned this to a colleague
whom I know to be a very competent programmer, and he responded
with surprise that programming wasn't visual at all for him. In spite of
his explanations, I never really understood exactly what is going on in
his head, but it works. :-)
--
Judson McClendon judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
.
- References:
- OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Robert
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Robert
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: tim
- OT: The Geek defense
- Prev by Date: Re: socket interface
- Next by Date: Re: socket interface
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|