comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Printing from M/F COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Printing from M/F COBOL
  • From: pcsjih
• Printing from M/F COBOL
  • From: razor
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: MikeB
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: MikeB
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Did I write a good (efficient) program?
  • From: MikeB
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Robert
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From:
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: tim
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Find Microfocus Cobol for linux o for windows
  • From: pac
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: tim
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: tim
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From:
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: PLUG: txt2pdf 9.6 can support codepage 437
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From:
• Re: Php & Acucobol
  • From: Robert
• Re: Php & Acucobol
  • From: Robert
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Php & Acucobol
  • From: Prova
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From:
• Re: The next Y2K: Y2.038K bug
  • From: tim
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: John Reagan
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The next Y2K: Y2.038K bug
  • From: Mickey
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From: Mickey
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• PLUG: txt2pdf 9.6 can support codepage 437
  • From: mail
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT Embryonic stem cell research was Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From:
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re Ping DD (by docdwarf@panix.com)
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• OT Canada and Iraq was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From: Kenneth
• Re: Ping: DD
  • From:
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• Ping: DD
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• OT Canada in Afghanistan not Iraq was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• OT: McCain's religion was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: Douglas Gallant
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From:
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Dates and vehicles was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• OT: Dates and vehicles was Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Open Associated file
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Open Associated file
  • From: Euro
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: (OT) Business Requirements Analysis. Sort Of (by docdwarf@panix.com)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Open Associated file
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• re: (OT) Business Requirements Analysis. Sort Of (by docdwarf@panix.com)
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Waldek Hebisch
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• [OT] Business Requirements Analysis... Sort Of
  • From:
• Open Associated file
  • From: Euro
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: PowerCOBOL conversion to DotNET
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Cobol 85 Standard
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: PowerCOBOL conversion to DotNET
  • From: frostyndus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting DSN name in a COBOL program
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Getting DSN name in a COBOL program
  • From: JulesB
• Re: COBOL IDE's
  • From: Pakku
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Waldek Hebisch
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Cobol_Blues
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: Dirty IT Jobs
  • From:
• Re: Dirty IT Jobs
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Dirty IT Jobs
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: Dirty IT Jobs
  • From:
• Re: Dirty IT Jobs
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• OT: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: The next Y2K: Y2.038K bug
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The next Y2K: Y2.038K bug
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Dirty IT Jobs
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL IDE's
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: COBOL IDE's
  • From: Pakku
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• The next Y2K: Y2.038K bug
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: COBOL IDE's
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• COBOL IDE's
  • From: Pakku
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Re RW on Working-Storage (was J4 - presentationdiscussion on Future of the COBOL Standard (by Richard riplin@azonic.co.nz)
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: PowerCOBOL conversion to DotNET
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: PowerCOBOL conversion to DotNET
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Re RW on Working-Storage (was J4 - presentationdiscussion on Future of the COBOL Standard (by Richard riplin@azonic.co.nz)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Re RW on Working-Storage (was J4 - presentationdiscussion on Future of the COBOL Standard (by Richard riplin@azonic.co.nz)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Alistair
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From: Alistair
• re: Re RW on Working-Storage (was J4 - presentationdiscussion on Future of the COBOL Standard (by Richard riplin@azonic.co.nz)
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From: Robert
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From:
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's (by William M. Klein wmklein@nospam.netcom.com)
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Ease of developing systems and cell phones was Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• RW on Working-Storage (was: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• (Non-Standard) ODO's
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• PowerCOBOL conversion to DotNET
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Richard
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: no apology is required bill
  • From:
• Re: Bill Klein on proposed cobol standards
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Ping: Bill Klein on proposed cobol standards
  • From: SeaSideSam
• no apology is required bill
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: HeyBub
• OT: If the tits don't fit, you must acquit.
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
  • From: Robert
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Richard
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From:
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: Alistair
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
  • From: tim
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: tim
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From:
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: jeff
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From:
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From:
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Numeric comparison
  • From: jeff
• Numeric comparison
  • From: jeff
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: KJ
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: KJ
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From:
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: KJ
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: KJ
• Re: inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: Rick Smith
• inherited cobol app., can't run (xm.exe)?
  • From: KJ
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From:
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: tim
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From:
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Robert
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: pottmi
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From:
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From:
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From:
• Re: MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: tlmfru
• MOVE COMP-3 TO DISPLAY.
  • From: pottmi
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From:
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Robert
• Re: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: Paul Knudsen
• OT: What do you do with your old computers?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [ann]vtd-xml 2.3
  • From: jimmy Zhang
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: OT: Global Warming? New Data Shows Ice Is Back
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: TCP Client Sample Code with Winsock
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: TCP Client Sample Code with Winsock
  • From: Thane
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From:
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Judson McClendon
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: tim
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From:
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: tim
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: tim
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: Tout: employment website
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Charles Hottel
• TCP Client Sample Code with Winsock
  • From: Rene_Surop
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From:
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Tout: employment website
  • From: Robert
• Re: Today (Feb 26) IBM announcements
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Robert
• Re: socket interface
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From:
• Re: The Geek defense
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: The Geek defense
  • From: Alistair

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)