Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:08:04 +1300
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8i9gs35ki31cu5831ei1o40tf75tfouls9@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:48:52 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nope. You are woefully out of touch. The tools we have now can be used to
build better tools. The days of telling computers what to do, line by
line,
are definitely numbered. We don't need to and it is far too expensive to
do
so. Who codes in assembler any more? No need to. Why don't we? It's the
same
argument.
But My Way is right. Those young whippersnappers who don't see
things my way will suffer for their heresy.
Not sure if you're aiming that at me or at Judson, Howard :-)
If at me, all I can say is, while I firmly believe what I wrote, I don't see
it as Holy Writ and I certainly wouldn't want to punish anyone who
disagrees.
(Except maybe that Gunshannon guy who doesn't believe in positronic
brains... yeah... we'll put him on the list...Linux lover... he needs to be
cast into the Lake of Fire... Come the Day.... mumble... rant...)
Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- From: Charles Hottel
- Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by Date: Re: The Geek defense
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Next by thread: Re: OT: The Geek defense
- Index(es):