Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:27:25 -0600
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:18:42 -0300, Clark F Morris
<cfmpublic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But that's only my experience, I can't speak for the industry.I believe that OCCURS DEPENDING ON is useful for tables that can have
a variable number of entries and are in sequence for searching using
SEARCH ALL.
It can save a search over my using a big table with high value records
at the end. On the other hand, it adds overhead as the run-time
program figures out sizes.
I suspect the savings you might think is there is illusory.
.
- References:
- Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- From: Clark F Morris
- Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- Prev by Date: Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- Next by Date: Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- Previous by thread: Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- Next by thread: Re: J4 - presentation/discussion on "Future of the COBOL Standard"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|