Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:51 -0600
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:08:44 -0500, "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Why did the originators of object orientation rename "structures" to
"objects"
and "procedures" to "methods"? Hubris and arrogance, in my opinion. Some
people believe object orientation is a completely new "paradigm" for
programming. The best known paradigms for computer languages are these.
I believe it was to divorce their design from programming terms. Of
course, that didn't last.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: tlmfru
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Previous by thread: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
