Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:31:28 -0600
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:10:05 -0500, "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
I believe it was to divorce their design from programming terms. Of
course, that didn't last.
Why is "to divorce their design from programming terms"
[used previously, assumed] not "[h]ubris and arrogance"?
Because language can carry prejudice. They wanted a blank slate that
in the new analysis. Why should that be hubris and arrogance?
Sometimes starting over can give insight if we don't carry too much
baggage with us.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|