Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:53:00 -0500
"Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13uqi1couu5v915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
And consider, from COBOL, that there is no _fundamental_
difference among program, function, and method definitions--
they do the same things and may be reused in another context
by changing the identifying text: "program", "method", or
"function", to one of the others.
An erroneous oversimplification on my part. Because methods
may refer to data outside their definition, any reuse of methods
would require a change in the means for accessing that data.
My appologies.
.
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|