Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:54:59 -0600
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:07:59 -0600, "tlmfru" <lacey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
While wanting to use different terms, to avoid confusion and baggage, was a
good idea, their choice was singularly poor. So far as I can tell EVERY
OO-oriented term carries unwanted meanings - e.g., my tiff last year with PD
over "function".
I can't argue with that.
.
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: tlmfru
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
