Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
On 28 Mar, 21:16, "Pete Dashwood"
"Structures" are NOT "objects" and there therefore is a good reason for not
retaining the procedural nomenclature; neither are "procedures" "methods",
just because on the surface they appear to be similar.
A horse is not a camel, despite both of them having a leg at each corner and
being used for transport.
Technically, there is very little difference between an earthworm, a
frog and a human (except for what theBible has to say about morphology
and anatomy). Camels and horses are virtually identical.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|