Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: "Charles Hottel" <chottel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:47:37 -0400
"Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:65553nF2cjsrhU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
And then he/she goes on to "mention" inheritance... and other things that
are available in OO :-)
I am surprised that while inheritance is usually mentioned composition is
frequently left out. Composition is as powerful as inheritance but is
often more flexible.
What did the Romans ever do for us...? :-)
Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
.
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
- Index(es):