Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
On 29 Mar, 06:18, tim <T...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:15:20 +0000, docdwarf wrote:
'Technically' there is even less difference between what you cite and
between A-negative and B-positive human blood... now I'd appreciate it if
you'd keep away from dealing with transfusions.
DD
Ditto. No more than one bit might separate a program that works correctly
and one that fails catastrophically. This is a relevant analogy, because
DNA is code.
Well said Tim. Most DNA is in fact what is called 'Junk DNA' with no
discernable function and with sections repeated without rhyme or
reason.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Robert
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: tim
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- References:
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: Alistair
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From:
- Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- From: tim
- Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by Date: Re: Confessions of a CoBOL programmer
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting take on Paradigms (OO vs Procedural)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|