Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- From: Robert <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 14:01:25 -0500
On Sun, 04 May 2008 11:01:51 +0100, Frederico Fonseca <real-email-in-msg-spam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 03 May 2008 01:05:28 -0500, Robert <no@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:51:38 +1200, "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Robert,
wrote:
I have some programs written in Fujitsu COBOL (generated by a tool) that run
in a Windows environment, read ISAM and write a RDB using embedded SQL and
ODBC.
I would like to have these programs run in a Unix environment. There is a
COBOL compiler (MicroFocus) available but it doesn't support SQL, and the
ISAM is C-ISAM. :-)
It does support SQL, either through the MF-supported OpenESQL precompiler or the Oracle
buggy and no longer supported PRO*COBOL. You can talk through ODBC or OCI (Oracle Call
Interface).
Can you please supply us with the link from Oracle that states that
PRO*COBOL is no longer supported?
When I called for support, no one could figure out why PRO*COBOL was crashing, or knew
anything about it. The answer was that text beyond column 80 makes it crash. Oracle
documentation doesn't say that, either.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- From: Frederico Fonseca
- Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- References:
- Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- From: Robert
- Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- From: Frederico Fonseca
- Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- Prev by Date: Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
- Next by Date: Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- Previous by thread: Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- Next by thread: Re: Thoughts on MF COBOL, Unix, and RDBMS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|