Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- From: Frederico Fonseca <real-email-in-msg-spam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:33:08 +0100
On Tue, 27 May 2008 17:13:32 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
In article <kneo34pn88qqq7eopvqnmc0mvlv6hdpo8n@xxxxxxx>,DD,
Frederico Fonseca <real-email-in-msg-spam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:03:55 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
In article <6a2b0aF35f7liU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pete Dashwood <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Robert" <no@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:t5vm34t5gtsfc2mv4qce963d8nra23bcu3@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:42:39 +0100, Frederico Fonseca
<real-email-in-msg-spam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
My apologies. I misunderstood your reply, and took it as related to my
code, not to that of Mr. Robert.
Yes. His code was incorrect in stating "
This will not work if product_code in the database is null." on the
condition that the index in question would be a primary key.
Frederico Fonseca
ema il: frederico_fonseca at syssoft-int.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Opinions on approach, please...
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- From:
- Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- From: Frederico Fonseca
- Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- From:
- Opinions on approach, please...
- Prev by Date: I can't remember if this has been posted before, so, here it is.
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on approach, please...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|