comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Programming Contest
  • From: foodman
• Re: Respect?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re Respect
  • From: Robert
• Re Respect
  • From: SeaSideSam
• Re: Respect?
  • From:
• Respect?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Graham Hobbs
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Richard
• Re: Experience with VAB - the farce continues
  • From: Robert
• Re: Experience with VAB - the farce continues
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Experience with VAB - the farce continues
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL tool
  • From: Richard
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL language and software
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: COBOL language and software
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Robert
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL language and software
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Andres Mauricio
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: PaulR
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Getting an Environment Variable (was: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: PaulR
• Re: Getting an Environment Variable (was: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Getting an Environment Variable (was: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: William M. Klein
• Getting an Environment Variable (was: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: PaulR
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Andres Mauricio
• Re: oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From:
• oferta laboral MAC S.A. Colombia COBOL MicroFocus NetExpress
  • From: Andres Mauricio
• Re: Declining Cobol job market
  • From: PR
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Tim Boyer
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: PR
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Declining Cobol job market
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Richard
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: PR
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• COBOL for utility program under Linux.
  • From: PR
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From:
• Re: The sort of experience that has led me to my theories iof pupular software development (was How compoetent are we)
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: The sort of experience that has led me to my theories iof pupular software development (was How compoetent are we)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: The sort of experience that has led me to my theories iof pupular software development (was How compoetent are we) (by tlmfru lacey@mts.net)
  • From: Robert
• re: The sort of experience that has led me to my theories iof pupular software development (was How compoetent are we) (by tlmfru lacey@mts.net)
  • From: SeaSideSam
• The sort of experience that has led me to my theories iof pupular software development (was How compoetent are we)
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From:
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From:
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Richard Brady
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From:
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From:
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From:
• Re: SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Robert
• SQL Expressions in Access, using Fujitsu COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: Robert
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: epc8
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From:
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Indianapolis Opportunities
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Lothar Krauss
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Gio
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Gio
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: PR
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: epc8
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Lothar Krauss
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Gio
• Re: The Limits of OO (was Re: How competent are we)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: sgbojo
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Robert
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: Gio
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Bruce M. Axtens
• Re: Join on mulltirow queries
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• The Limits of OO (was Re: How competent are we)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Join on mulltirow queries
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From:
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Error 98,90
  • From: sgbojo
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From:
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Error 98,90
  • From: Gio
• Re: BRIEF Editor
  • From: JussiJ
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Ron
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: Robert Iles
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From:
• COBOL utilities for businesses
  • From: x01001x
• Re: Re How competent are we
  • From: tlmfru
• Re How competent are we
  • From: seasidesam
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: hans . igel
• Join on mulltirow queries
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: RM COBOL Question
  • From: EJP
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: hans . igel
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: Robert
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From:
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Honeywell Bull and other mainframes was Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Who owns, manages and is responsible for the data was Re: Cobol's File System Vs. RDBMs...
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From:
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: tlmfru
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: foodman
• Date formatting (was: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From:
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Karl Kiesel
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From:
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: mario
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Karl Kiesel
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any better ideas?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Any better ideas?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From:
• Re: Cobol Programmer
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: California's COBOL payroll system
  • From: Rick Smith
• Cobol Programmer
  • From: Tanvir
• Re: California's COBOL payroll system
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: California's COBOL payroll system
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: California's COBOL payroll system
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file)
  • From: Robert
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Richard
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: OT - what's off-topic (or is this OT)?
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file)
  • From:
• OT - what's off-topic (or is this OT)?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From:
• CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: Honeywell Bull and other mainframes was Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Richard
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Ping Mr. Pete Dashwood @removethis.enternet.co.nz
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Honeywell Bull and other mainframes was Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Honeywell Bull and other mainframes was Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Clark F Morris
• CoBOL and Contracting (new thread)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ping Mr. Pete Dashwood @removethis.enternet.co.nz
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: billious
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Ping Mr. Pete Dashwood @removethis.enternet.co.nz
  • From: Robert Iles
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: HDD Number
  • From: Kellie Fitton
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• HDD Number
  • From: mario
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Robert
• OT: IT Contracting WAS: Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• OT: Submitting your resume WAS Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From:
• OT: Submitting your resume WAS Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - Make subject lines relevant
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From:
• CoBOL and Contracting (was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• CoBOL and Contracting (Was: All X'0D' lost during...)
  • From: klshafer@xxxxxxx
• Re: How To create a program That accept file of different Record Length & create a file with the same record length as the input one
  • From: tiyinyin
• OT - Make subject lines relevant
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: open dialog in acu cobol
  • From: mario
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• open dialog in acu cobol
  • From: mario
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Bill Gunshannon
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: Oracle tips
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From:
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: taoxianfeng
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: taoxianfeng
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: taoxianfeng
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: taoxianfeng
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: taoxianfeng
• Oracle tips
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Robert
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file usingmicrofocus se
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: All X'0D' lost during reading line sequential file using microfocus se
  • From: Frank Swarbrick

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Cobol  > comp.lang.cobol  > 2008-08