Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:28:00 -0600
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:44:59 -0600, "tlmfru" <lacey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What was worse was PERFORMING a label and then, within the scope of that
PERFORM doing a GOTO to it as well. That isn't formally forbidden but
always struck me as a chancy thing to do. (It was a method used to
implement loops before PERFORM/END-PERFORM was available).
When I worked for EDS a decade or more ago, our published standard was
for each perform to be of a section that consisted of a paragraph and
an exit which wasn't used. I disliked it back then, and hope it has
been changed since.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: tlmfru
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From:
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- References:
- COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From:
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Silfax
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: tlmfru
- COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Prev by Date: Re: Cobol for Visual sutdio
- Next by Date: Re: Cobol for Visual sutdio
- Previous by thread: Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Next by thread: Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Index(es):