Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:19:40 +1300
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:27gjg41tvsi5a9t9jv49pjr57604fn9usp@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:24:12 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's why you don't mix SECTIONs and Paragraph PERFORMS.
PERFORM AAA
...is less verbose than PERFORM AAA-PARAGRAPH THRU AAA-EXIT.
The less cluttered program code, is the easier it is to maintain. (In the
old days, the fact that it compiled quicker was a consideration too, but
that hardly applies any more...)
My objection was most strongly against:
PERFORM AAA THRU AAA-EXIT.
where AAA is a section name and AAA-EXIT a paragraph name.
I can honestly say I have never seen that (Thank Goodness!!!).
I echo your disapproval... :-)
Pete.
--
"I used to write COBOL...now I can do anything."
.
- References:
- COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From:
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Silfax
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: tlmfru
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: tlmfru
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- From: Howard Brazee
- COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Prev by Date: Re: Cobol for Visual sutdio
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Previous by thread: Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Next by thread: Re: COBOL ain't quite dead - yet !
- Index(es):