comp.lang.cobol
- zCobol,
Alistair
- Re: zCobol, William M. Klein
- Intelligence is in the controller,
HeyBub
- Re: Intelligence is in the controller, Pete Dashwood
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users,
yyyc186
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users,
Pete Dashwood
- Message not available
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users, Howard Brazee
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users,
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users, Howard Brazee
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users,
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users, Pete Dashwood
- Re: On User Defined Functions and OO, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Seasons greetings to all in CLC., HeyBub
- Re: OT: Seasons greetings to all in CLC., SkippyPB
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?,
btiffin
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?,
William M. Klein
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?, James J. Gavan
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?, btiffin
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?, btiffin
- Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?, William M. Klein
- Re: Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?, btiffin
- Re: Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?,
William M. Klein
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, Karl Kiesel
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test,
PR
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test,
William M. Klein
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, Paul
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, William M. Klein
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test,
William M. Klein
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, Paul
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, Jeff Campbell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test, Vince Coen
- Re: some help with COBDATA please...,
charles . goodman
- Re: some help with COBDATA please..., Pete Dashwood
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: some help with COBDATA please...,
Vince Coen
- Re: some help with COBDATA please..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test, Karl Kiesel
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test,
Roger While
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test, Arnold Trembley
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test,
Jeff Campbell
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test,
Arnold Trembley
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test, William M. Klein
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test - TRUNC(OPT), Arnold Trembley
- Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test,
Arnold Trembley
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), btiffin
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again),
Paul
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again),
William M. Klein
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Paul
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Howard Brazee
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), William M. Klein
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Howard Brazee
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Jeff Campbell
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again),
William M. Klein
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Robert
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again),
Alain Reymond
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Alain Reymond
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Karl Kiesel
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), tlmfru
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Arnold Trembley
- Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again), Jeff Campbell
- Re: Cobol Open Source,
Paul
- Re: Cobol Open Source,
Richard
- Re: Cobol Open Source, Paul
- Re: Cobol Open Source,
Richard
- Re: Cobol Open Source, Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Paul H
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul H
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Robert
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Bill Gunshannon
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., btiffin
- Re: I need a new compiler..., William M. Klein
- Re: I need a new compiler..., btiffin
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Alain Reymond
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
James J. Gavan
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul H
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler..., PR
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler..., tlmfru
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., PR
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Mattias
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., William M. Klein
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., William M. Klein
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Michael Wojcik
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Michael Wojcik
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Michael Mattias
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Michael Mattias
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Michael Mattias
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Howard Brazee
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., HeyBub
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Michael Wojcik
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Howard Brazee
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, HeyBub
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, William M. Klein
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, PR
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Pete Dashwood
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Pete Dashwood
- Re: C and Low-level Storage,
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Pete Dashwood
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage,
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Pete Dashwood
- Re: C and Low-level Storage,
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage,
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Howard Brazee
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Richard Brady
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- IBM system z and write protected code was Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler..., Clark F Morris
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Michael Wojcik
- Re: C and Low-level Storage, Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Paul H
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Paul H
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler..., HeyBub
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Richard
- Re: I need a new compiler..., William M. Klein
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: I need a new compiler..., Paul
- Re: I need a new compiler...,
Paul H
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Richard
- Re: Functions as receiving items, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Jeff Campbell
- Re: Functions as receiving items, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Richard
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Michael Wojcik
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Howard Brazee
- Re: Functions as receiving items, Michael Wojcik
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Richard
- Re: Functions as receiving items, Michael Wojcik
- Re: Functions as receiving items, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Functions as receiving items,
Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
HeyBub
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Robert
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Richard
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Message not available
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Richard
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Richard
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Richard
- Windows permissions was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Clark F Morris
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Clark F Morris
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Message not available
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Michael Wojcik
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...,
Pete Dashwood
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Howard Brazee
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Bill Gunshannon
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it..., Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages, Michael Wojcik
- Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages, Darren Bane
- Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages,
Frank Swarbrick
- Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages, Charles Hottel
- Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages,
Michael Wojcik
- Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages, Pete Dashwood
- Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages,
Michael Wojcik
- Re: string to correct integer,
- Re: string to correct integer,
Karl Kiesel
- Re: string to correct integer,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Robert
- Re: string to correct integer,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer,
Robert
- Re: string to correct integer, Richard
- Re: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: string to correct integer,
Richard
- Re: string to correct integer,
Howard Brazee
- Re: string to correct integer, SkippyPB
- Re: string to correct integer,
Howard Brazee
- Re: string to correct integer,
Robert
- Re: string to correct integer,
Pete Dashwood
- Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Fujitsu and IBM mainframe compatibility (was: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, William M. Klein
- Re: Fujitsu and IBM mainframe compatibility (was: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Robert
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Robert
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Robert
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, James J. Gavan
- Re: string to correct integer, Pete Dashwood
- Re: string to correct integer, Robert
- Re: string to correct integer,
Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content,
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content, HeyBub
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content,
HeyBub
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content, Pete Dashwood
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content, SkippyPB
- Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content, Howard Brazee
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?,
Robert
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?, Pete Dashwood
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?,
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?, tlmfru
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?, Howard Brazee
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?,
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?, Howard Brazee
- [OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?),
- Re: [OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?), Howard Brazee
- Re: [OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?),
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?,
Howard Brazee
- Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?, SkippyPB
Loading
